Time is of the essence in the global securities markets. It may be a reliever for you, as many securities markets operating across the globe are shortening their securities settlement cycle from the date of execution(T+2) to just one single day, T+1 Settlement. Though it is enticing news for many participants, how well prepared are market participants for this switchover? What does this shift bring to the table? Are they on track for the transition? How are they prepared for the automation to drive their post-trade processing in a T+1 world?
Shifting to a T+1 settlement cycle primarily aims to mitigate pre-settlement risks arising from counterparties failing to meet settlement deadlines.
This move helps manage risk by aligning with the practice of clearing transactions through central counterparties (CCPs). Consequently, the reduction in the settlement timeframe leads to decreased margins and a subsequent decrease in the required capital. This enhances capital efficiency, bolsters liquidity, and results in cost savings. The US Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) approximates that eliminating one day’s exposure to risk could potentially result in a 41% reduction in the volatility component of CCP margin requirements. Any entity failing to be ready by the deadline will have severe impacts on its business. Our IMS trade process solution is designed to streamline your processes in an effort to reduce risk and strengthen and modernize the securities settlement cycle.
Below shared are the perks of experiencing the transition from T+2 to T+1 settlement.
The shift from T+2 to T+1 settlement implements a shorter settlement period, reducing pre-settlement risks and counterparty risk management.
T+1 settlement will substantially improve market liquidity by making funds easily available from transactions for the participants. This enhances liquidity benefits for market participants, promotes a more dynamic, and builds a responsive capital market ecosystem.
T+1 settlement leads to lower margin requirements for both buyers and sellers. This reduction in margin requirements frees up capital for market participants and minimizes their exposure, contributing to a more efficient and secure trading environment.
The faster settlement cycle of T+1 accelerates capital turnover. This, in turn, enables quicker capital reinvestment, facilitating more agile liquidity management and optimizing the deployment of financial resources.
So, as the world gears up for the US move to T+1, we have curated some facts by examining the likely impacts of this transition on different regions.
Allow us to show them!
The world's influential and substantial liquid capital market, The United States, is proposing 28 May 2024 after the Memorial Day holiday — as the implementation date for T+1 settlement for all transactions in US equities, corporate debt, and unit investment trusts. In fact, Canada is in pursuit of making the change the day before to stay aligned with its neighboring countries. While the stock exchange's trading hours (09:30-16:00) remain unchanged, the post-trade processing landscape will undergo a shift under the new rule. Broker-dealers must now complete most of the post-trade processing on the trade date to meet the 21:00 affirmation deadline. Transactions failing to settle during the overnight cycle will result in elevated DTCC charges. Additionally, registered investment advisors are now responsible for documenting the precise time and date for each confirmation, allocation, and affirmation.
In January 2023, Indian exchanges successfully completed the gradual monthly transition from a T+2 to a T+1 settlement cycle. This brought India in line with China, where securities settle T+0 and cash settle T+1 on the exchange markets. Early feedback suggests that implementing T+1 in India was a victory for the capital market, yielding efficiencies and encountering no notable issues. At a macroeconomic level, the reduction of settlement timeframes contributes to diminishing overall risk within the financial system. This is achieved through a decrease in margin requirements and a mitigation of pro-cyclical margin and liquidity challenges. Market participants stand to gain substantial advantages, including a diminished exposure to credit, counterparty, and operational risks, as well as the expeditious settlement of transactions.
Achieving a T+1 settlement cycle poses a complex challenge for Europe due to the absence of a unified market operating under a harmonized legal framework and a consolidated infrastructure for post-trade processing. The region encompasses diverse markets functioning under a multitude of rules and operational nuances, creating a fragmented landscape for trading, clearing, and settlement. The substantial challenge underlying settlement inefficiencies arise from the need for more standardization and automation across markets before the settlement occurs.
ECS Fin is an engineering enterprise that specializes in process optimization. We design software solutions with a systems approach to transaction processing.
50 Main Street #1000-1036 White Plains, NY 10606, New York
© 2024 ECS FIN. All Rights Reserved.